You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 66 No. 9, September 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Neurological Review
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Cerebrovascular Disease
 •Stroke
 •Rehabilitation Medicine
 •Review
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Robotic Devices as Therapeutic and Diagnostic Tools for Stroke Recovery

Bruce T. Volpe, MD; Patricio T. Huerta, PhD; Johanna L. Zipse, BA; Avrielle Rykman, OTR; Dylan Edwards, PhD; Laura Dipietro, PhD; Neville Hogan, PhD; Hermano I. Krebs, PhD

Arch Neurol. 2009;66(9):1086-1090.

The understanding that recovery of brain function after stroke is imperfect has prompted decades of effort to engender speedier and better recovery through environmental manipulation. Clinical evidence has shown that the performance plateau exhibited by patients with chronic stroke, usually signaling an end of standard rehabilitation, might represent a period of consolidation rather than a performance optimum. These results highlight the difficulty of translating pertinent neurological data into pragmatic changes in clinical programs. This opinion piece focuses on upper limb impairment reduction after robotic training. We propose that robotic devices be considered as novel tools that might be used alone or in combination with novel pharmacology and other bioengineered devices. Additionally, robotic devices can measure motor performance objectively and will contribute to a detailed phenotype of stroke recovery.


Author Affiliations: Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, Burke-Cornell Medical Research Institute, White Plains, New York (Drs Volpe, Huerta, and Edwards and Mss Zipse and Rykman); and Newman Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering (Drs Dipietro, Hogan, and Krebs), and Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences (Dr Hogan), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge. Ms Zipse is currently with MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, Massachusetts.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

This Month in Archives of Neurology
Arch Neurol. 2009;66(9):1056-1057.
FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.